MedKoo Cat#: 100690 | Name: Paclitaxel
Featured New

Description:

WARNING: This product is for research use only, not for human or veterinary use.

Paclitaxel is a microtubule-stabilizing agent that binds to β-tubulin with high affinity (Kd = 20-100 nM), preventing microtubule depolymerization and inducing mitotic arrest at the G2/M phase. This mechanism leads to apoptosis through Bcl-2 phosphorylation and caspase activation. Paclitaxel exhibits potent cytotoxicity in various cancer cell lines, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 5-50 nM, and effectively suppresses tumor growth in xenograft models at doses of 10-20 mg/kg. Its strong antiproliferative activity makes it a key chemotherapeutic agent for treating breast, ovarian, and lung cancers.

Chemical Structure

Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel
CAS#33069-62-4 (free base)

Theoretical Analysis

MedKoo Cat#: 100690

Name: Paclitaxel

CAS#: 33069-62-4 (free base)

Chemical Formula: C47H51NO14

Exact Mass: 853.3310

Molecular Weight: 853.91

Elemental Analysis: C, 66.11; H, 6.02; N, 1.64; O, 26.23

Price and Availability

Size Price Availability Quantity
200mg USD 150.00 Ready to ship
500mg USD 250.00 Ready to ship
1g USD 450.00 Ready to ship
2g USD 750.00 Ready to ship
5g USD 1,650.00 Ready to Ship
10g USD 2,950.00 Ready to ship
Show More
Bulk Inquiry
Buy Now
Add to Cart
Synonym
BMS 181339-01; BMS181339-01; BMS-181339-01; Brand name: Taxol; Anzatax; Asotax; Bristaxol; Praxel; Taxol Konzentrat. TAX.
IUPAC/Chemical Name
(2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12aR,12bS)-9-(((2R,3S)-3-benzamido-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoyl)oxy)-12-(benzoyloxy)-4,11-dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a,12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca[3,4]benzo[1,2-b]oxete-6,12b-diyl diacetate
InChi Key
RCINICONZNJXQF-MZXODVADSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C47H51NO14/c1-25-31(60-43(56)36(52)35(28-16-10-7-11-17-28)48-41(54)29-18-12-8-13-19-29)23-47(57)40(61-42(55)30-20-14-9-15-21-30)38-45(6,32(51)22-33-46(38,24-58-33)62-27(3)50)39(53)37(59-26(2)49)34(25)44(47,4)5/h7-21,31-33,35-38,40,51-52,57H,22-24H2,1-6H3,(H,48,54)/t31-,32-,33+,35-,36+,37+,38-,40-,45+,46-,47+/m0/s1
SMILES Code
O=C1[C@H](OC(C)=O)C(C2(C)C)=C(C)[C@@H](OC([C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(C3=CC=CC=C3)=O)C4=CC=CC=C4)=O)C[C@@]2(O)[C@@H](OC(C5=CC=CC=C5)=O)[C@@]6([H])[C@@]1(C)[C@@H](O)C[C@@]7([H])OC[C@]76OC(C)=O
Appearance
white solid powder
Purity
>98% (or refer to the Certificate of Analysis)
Shipping Condition
Shipped under ambient temperature as non-hazardous chemical. This product is stable enough for a few weeks during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs.
Storage Condition
Dry, dark and at 0 - 4 C for short term (days to weeks) or -20 C for long term (months to years).
Solubility
Soluble in DMSO, not in water
Shelf Life
>2 years if stored properly
Drug Formulation
This drug may be formulated in DMSO
Stock Solution Storage
0 - 4 C for short term (days to weeks), or -20 C for long term (months).
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
More Info
Paclitaxel is a mitotic inhibitor used in cancer chemotherapy. It was discovered in a National Cancer Institute program at the Research Triangle Institute in 1967 when Monroe E. Wall and Mansukh C. Wani isolated it from the bark of the Pacific Yew tree, Taxus brevifolia and named it 'taxol'. When it was developed commercially by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) the generic name was changed to 'paclitaxel' and the BMS compound is sold under the trademark 'TAXOL'. In this formulation, paclitaxel is dissolved in Cremophor EL and ethanol, as a delivery agent. A newer formulation, in which paclitaxel is bound to albumin, is sold under the trademark Abraxane. Paclitaxel is now used to treat patients with lung, ovarian, breast cancer, head and neck cancer, and advanced forms of Kaposi's sarcoma. Paclitaxel is also used for the prevention of restenosis. Paclitaxel stabilizes microtubules and as a result, interferes with the normal breakdown of microtubules during cell division. Together with docetaxel, it forms the drug category of the taxanes. It was the subject of a notable total synthesis by Robert A. Holton. As well as offering substantial improvement in patient care, paclitaxel has been a relatively controversial drug. There was originally concern because of the environmental impact of its original sourcing, no longer used, from the Pacific yew. In addition, the assignment of rights, and even the name itself, to Bristol-Myers Squibb were the subject of public debate and Congressional hearings.   History According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paclitaxel, In 1955 the National Cancer Institute (NCI) set up the Cancer Chemotherapy National Service Center (CCNSC) to act as a public screening center for anti-cancer activity in compounds submitted by external institutions and companies. Although the majority of compounds screened were of synthetic origin, one chemist, Jonathan Hartwell, who was employed there from 1958 onwards, had had experience of natural product derived compounds and began a plant screening operation. After some years of informal arrangements, in July 1960 the NCI commissioned USDA botanists to collect samples from about 1000 plant species per year. On August 21, 1962, one of those botanists, Arthur S. Barclay, collected bark from a single Pacific yew tree, Taxus brevifolia, in a forest north of the town of Packwood, Washington as part of a four month trip collecting material from over 200 different species. The material was then processed by a number of specialist CCNSC subcontractors and one of the Taxus samples was found to be cytotoxic in a cellular assay on May 22, 1964. Accordingly, in late 1964 or early 1965, the fractionation and isolation laboratory run by Monroe E. Wall in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, began work on fresh Taxus samples, isolating the active ingredient in September 1966 and announcing their findings at an April 1967 American Chemical Society meeting in Miami Beach. They named the pure compound 'taxol' in June 1967.  Wall and his colleague Wani published their results, including the chemical structure, in 1971. The NCI continued to commission work to collect more Taxus bark and to isolate increasing quantities of taxol. By 1969 28 kg of crude extract had been isolated from almost 1,200 kg of bark, although this ultimately yielded only 10g of pure material.But for several years no use was made of the compound by the NCI. In 1975 it was shown to be active in another in vitro system ; two years later a new department head reviewed the data and finally recommended that taxol be moved on to the next stage in the discovery process. This required increasing quantities of purified taxol, up to 600g, and in 1977 a further request for 7,000 lbs of bark was made. In 1978, two NCI researchers published a report showing that taxol was mildly effective in leukaemic mice. In November 1978, taxol was shown to be effective in xenograft studies.Meanwhile taxol began to be well known in the cell biology, as well as the cancer community, with a publication in early 1979 by Susan B. Horwitz, a molecular pharmacologist at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, that showed that taxol had a previously unknown mechanism of action involving the stabilization of microtubules. Together with formulation problems, this increased interest from researchers meant that by 1980 the NCI envisaged needing to collect 20,000 lbs of bark. Animal toxicology studies were complete by June 1982, and in November NCI applied for the IND necessary to begin clinical trials in humans.   Production of Paclitaxel From 1967 to 1993, almost all paclitaxel produced was derived from bark from the Pacific yew, the harvesting of which kills the tree in the process. The processes used were descendants of the original isolation method of Wall and Wani; by 1987 the NCI had contracted Hauser Chemical Research of Boulder, Colorado to handle bark on the scale needed for Phase II and III trials. While there was considerable uncertainty about how large the wild population of Taxus brevifola was and what the eventual demand for taxol would be, it had been clear for many years that an alternative, sustainable source of supply would be needed. Initial attempts used needles from the tree, or material from other related Taxus species, including cultivated ones. But these attempts were bedevilled by the relatively low and often highly variable yields obtained. It was not until the early 1990s, at a time of increased sensitivity to the ecology of the forests of the Pacific Northwest, that taxol was successfully extracted on a clinically useful scale from these sources. From the late 1970s, chemists in the US and France had been interested in taxol. A number of US groups, including one led by Robert A. Holton, attempted a total synthesis of the molecule, starting from petrochemical-derived starting materials. This work was primarily motivated as a way of generating chemical knowledge, rather than with any expectation of developing a practical production technique. By contrast the French group of Pierre Potier at the CNRS quickly recognized the problem of yield. His laboratory was on a campus populated by the related yew Taxus baccata, so that needles were available locally in large quantity. By 1981 he had shown that it was feasible to isolate relatively large quantities of the compound 10-deacetylbaccatin, a plausible first step for a semi-synthetic production route to taxol. By 1988 he co-published such a semi-synthetic route from needles of Taxus baccata. The view of the NCI, however, was that even this route was not practical. By 1988, and particularly with Potier's publication, it was clear to Holton as well that a practical semi-synthetic production route would be important. By late 1989, Holton's group had developed a semi-synthetic route to paclitaxel with twice the yield of the Potier process. Florida State University, where Holton worked, signed a deal with Bristol-Myers Squibb to license this and future patents. In 1992, Holton patented an improved process with an 80% yield. BMS took the process in-house and started to manufacture paclitaxel in Ireland from 10-deacetylbaccatin isolated from the needles of the European yew. In early 1993, BMS were able to announce that they would cease reliance on Pacific yew bark by the end of 1995, effectively terminating the ecological controversy over its use. This announcement also made good their commitment to develop an alternative supply route, made to the NCI in their CRADA application of 1989. Currently, all paclitaxel production for BMS uses plant cell fermentation (PCF) technology developed by the biotechnology company Phyton Biotech, Inc and carried out at their plant in Germany. This starts from a specific taxus cell line propagated in aqueous medium in large fermentation tanks. Paclitaxel is then extracted directly, purified by chromatography and isolated by crystallization. Compared to the semi-synthesis, PCF eliminates the need for many hazardous chemicals and saves a considerable amount of energy. In 1993 it was discovered that taxol was coincidentally produced in a newly described fungus living in the yew tree.  It has since been found in a number of other endophytic fungi, including Nodulisporium sylviforme, opening the possibility of taxol production by culturing one of these fungal species. The initial motivation for synthetic approaches to paclitaxel included the opportunity to create closely related compounds. Indeed this approach led to the development of docetaxel.   DRUG DESCRIPTION TAXOL (paclitaxel) Injection is a clear, colorless to slightly yellow viscous solution. It is supplied as a nonaqueous solution intended for dilution with a suitable parenteral fluid prior to intravenous infusion. TAXOL is available in 30 mg (5 mL), 100 mg (16.7 mL), and 300 mg (50 mL) multidose vials. Each mL of sterile nonpyrogenic solution contains 6 mg paclitaxel, 527 mg of purified Cremophor® EL* (polyoxyethylated castor oil) and 49.7% (v/v) dehydrated alcohol, USP. Paclitaxel is a natural product with antitumor activity. TAXOL (paclitaxel) is obtained via a semi-synthetic process from Taxus baccata. The chemical name for paclitaxel is 5β,20-Epoxy-1,2α,4,7β,10β,13α-hexahydroxytax-11-en-9-one 4,10-diacetate 2-benzoate 13-ester with (2R,3S)-N-benzoyl-3-phenylisoserine.  Paclitaxel is a white to off-white crystalline powder with the empirical formula C47H51NO14 and a molecular weight of 853.9. It is highly lipophilic, insoluble in water, and melts at around 216-217° C.  
Biological target:
Antineoplastic agent that stabilizes tubulin polymerization.
In vitro activity:
PTX (Paclitaxel) or PTX-Tf-NPs (Paclitaxel transferrin nanoparticles) reduce the viability of rat glioblastoma C6 cells in a dosedependent manner, but PTX-Tf-NPs exhibit a stronger inhibitory effect at higher concentrations compared with PTX. Rat glioblastoma C6 cells were treated with Tf-NPs, PTX or PTX-Tf-NPs for 48 h, and cell viability was detected using the MTT assay. The percentages of cell viability are presented in Fig. 1 and Table I. The results indicated that treatment with Tf-NPs at concentrations of 0.0032 or 0.016 µg/ml did not inhibit C6 cell viability, whereas Tf-NP treatment at concentrations of 0.08, 0.4, 2 and 10 µg/ml resulted in a cell viability of 92, 97, 97 and 88% in C6 cells, respectively, compared with control cells, indicating that Tf-NPs alone cause a low cytotoxicity in C6 cells. Both PTX and PTX-Tf-NPs exhibited a dose-dependent effect on cell viability in C6 cells. Following PTX treatment at concentrations of 0.0032, 0.016 and 0.08 µg/ml, C6 cell viability was 91, 87 and 83%, respectively, while following PTX-Tf-NP treatment, cell viability was 95, 91 and 83%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that at a concentration of ≤0.08 µg/ml, no significant difference in cell viability by treatment with either PTX or PTX-Tf-NPs was observed, indicating that PTX and PTX-Tf-NPs exhibit similar cell viability inhibitory effects at these concentrations. Nevertheless, at concentrations of 0.4, 2 and 10 µg/ml, C6 cells treated with PTX exhibited an average viability of 81, 74 and 62%, respectively, but C6 cells treated with PTX-Tf-NPs exhibited significantly lower viability compared with cells treated with PTX (78, 69 and 56%, respectively). This suggested that PTX-Tf-NPs were more potent compared with PTX in reducing the viability of C6 glioblastoma cells at higher concentrations. Reference: Exp Ther Med. 2021 Apr; 21(4): 292. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885080/
In vivo activity:
The blank and the PCX(Paclitxel)-loaded CD nanoparticles were administered to the tumor-bearing mice, and the change in tumor size was followed for 14 days (Figure 8 and Figure 9). On day 5, compared to the control groups that received physiological saline or blank CD nanoparticles, an approximately 25% reduction was observed in the tumor size of the mice treated with PCX-loaded nanoparticle or PCX solution (Figure 8). The most significant difference between the groups was achieved on day 8 in which the tumors continued to grow in the physiological saline control group; on the other hand, either the blank or the PCX-loaded CD nanoparticles reduced the tumor burden. In general, the PCX-loaded positively charged nanoparticles were the most efficient antitumor formulation, albeit not reaching the level of statistical significance (Figure 8). On day 14, the tumor size was reduced by 50% in all groups that were treated with blank or PCX-loaded CD formulations, or PCX solution. Collectively, the antitumor effect of the PCX-loaded amphiphilic CD nanoparticles was observed earlier than the PCX solution. Interestingly, in the long run, the blank CD nanoparticles were also capable of hindering the tumor growth (Figure 8 and Figure 9). Accordingly, Erdogar et al. showed that folatetargeted CD nanoparticles were better tolerated by animals and localized in the tumor area than PCX solution in Cremophor®EL. These results support that the CD nanoparticles can be a good candidate for increasing the efficacy and safety of PCX therapy in breast cancer. Reference: Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Feb; 11(2): 515. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922126/
Solvent mg/mL mM
Solubility
Cloroform 1.0 1.17
DMF 5.0 5.86
DMSO 77.9 91.17
DMSO:PBS (pH 7.2) (1:10) 0.1 0.12
Ethanol 14.3 16.78
Methanol 5.0 5.86
Note: There can be variations in solubility for the same chemical from different vendors or different batches from the same vendor. The following factors can affect the solubility of the same chemical: solvent used for crystallization, residual solvent content, polymorphism, salt versus free form, degree of hydration, solvent temperature. Please use the solubility data as a reference only. Warming and sonication will facilitate dissolving. Still have questions? Please contact our Technical Support scientists.

Preparing Stock Solutions

The following data is based on the product molecular weight 853.91 Batch specific molecular weights may vary from batch to batch due to the degree of hydration, which will affect the solvent volumes required to prepare stock solutions.

Recalculate based on batch purity %
Concentration / Solvent Volume / Mass 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 1.15 mL 5.76 mL 11.51 mL
5 mM 0.23 mL 1.15 mL 2.3 mL
10 mM 0.12 mL 0.58 mL 1.15 mL
50 mM 0.02 mL 0.12 mL 0.23 mL
Formulation protocol:
1. Wang L, Liu C, Qiao F, Li M, Xin H, Chen N, Wu Y, Liu J. Analysis of the cytotoxic effects, cellular uptake and cellular distribution of paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles in glioblastoma cells in vitro. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Apr;21(4):292. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9723. Epub 2021 Jan 27. PMID: 33717235; PMCID: PMC7885080. 2. Yang X, Qin J, Gong C, Yang J. Propofol enhanced the cell sensitivity to paclitaxel (PTX) in prostatic cancer (PC) through modulation of HOTAIR. Genes Genomics. 2021 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s13258-021-01093-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33893626. 3. Varan G, Varan C, Öztürk SC, Benito JM, Esendağlı G, Bilensoy E. Therapeutic Efficacy and Biodistribution of Paclitaxel-Bound Amphiphilic Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles: Analyses in 3D Tumor Culture and Tumor-Bearing Animals In Vivo. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Feb 18;11(2):515. doi: 10.3390/nano11020515. PMID: 33670527; PMCID: PMC7922126. 4. Gui G, Fan Z, Ning Y, Yuan C, Zhang B, Xu Q. Optimization, Characterization and in vivo Evaluation of Paclitaxel-Loaded FolateConjugated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021 Mar 19;16:2283-2295. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S287434. PMID: 33776433; PMCID: PMC7992116.
In vitro protocol:
1. Wang L, Liu C, Qiao F, Li M, Xin H, Chen N, Wu Y, Liu J. Analysis of the cytotoxic effects, cellular uptake and cellular distribution of paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles in glioblastoma cells in vitro. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Apr;21(4):292. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9723. Epub 2021 Jan 27. PMID: 33717235; PMCID: PMC7885080. 2. Yang X, Qin J, Gong C, Yang J. Propofol enhanced the cell sensitivity to paclitaxel (PTX) in prostatic cancer (PC) through modulation of HOTAIR. Genes Genomics. 2021 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s13258-021-01093-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33893626.
In vivo protocol:
1. Varan G, Varan C, Öztürk SC, Benito JM, Esendağlı G, Bilensoy E. Therapeutic Efficacy and Biodistribution of Paclitaxel-Bound Amphiphilic Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles: Analyses in 3D Tumor Culture and Tumor-Bearing Animals In Vivo. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Feb 18;11(2):515. doi: 10.3390/nano11020515. PMID: 33670527; PMCID: PMC7922126. 2. Gui G, Fan Z, Ning Y, Yuan C, Zhang B, Xu Q. Optimization, Characterization and in vivo Evaluation of Paclitaxel-Loaded FolateConjugated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021 Mar 19;16:2283-2295. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S287434. PMID: 33776433; PMCID: PMC7992116.
1: Amniouel S, Yalamanchili K, Sankararaman S, Jafri MS. Evaluating Ovarian Cancer Chemotherapy Response Using Gene Expression Data and Machine Learning. BioMedInformatics. 2024 Jun;4(2):1396-1424. doi: 10.3390/biomedinformatics4020077. Epub 2024 May 22. PMID: 39149564; PMCID: PMC11326537. 2: Sankaranarayanan I, Kume M, Mohammed A, Mwirigi JM, Inturi NN, Munro G, Petersen KA, Tavares-Ferreira D, Price TJ. Persistent changes in nociceptor translatomes govern hyperalgesic priming in mouse models. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Aug 8:2024.08.07.606891. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.07.606891. PMID: 39149295; PMCID: PMC11326310. 3: Wan X, Chen C, Zhan J, Ye S, Li R, Shen M. Dendritic polylysine co-delivery of paclitaxel and siAXL enhances the sensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer chemotherapy. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Aug 1;12:1415191. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1415191. PMID: 39148942; PMCID: PMC11324506. 4: Zhang X, Xiong W, Kong G, Zhen Y, Zeng Q, Wang S, Chen S, Gu J, Li C, Guo K. Corrigendum: Paclitaxel-incorporated nanoparticles improve functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 1;15:1451951. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1451951. Erratum for: Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 05;13:957433. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.957433. PMID: 39148535; PMCID: PMC11324568. 5: Li X. The Predictive Value of BUB1 in the Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int Dent J. 2024 Aug 15:S0020-6539(24)00201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.012. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39147662. 6: Li Y, Feng Q, Gao Q, Wang Y, Zhao S, Zhang X, Zhao M. PTX-RPPR, a conjugate of paclitaxel and NRP-1 peptide inhibitor to prevent tumor growth and metastasis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024 Aug 14;178:117264. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117264. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39146856. 7: Ross TL, Na R, Au-Yeung G, DeFazio A, Friedlander M, Sivakumaran T, Livingstone K AM, Nagle CM, O'Neill H, Williams M, Webb PM, Beesley VL. Are exercise and sitting time during chemotherapy for ovarian cancer associated with treatment-related side-effects, chemotherapy completion and survival? Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Aug 14;190:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.07.684. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39146755. 8: Zheng W, Yu W, Hua R, He J, Wu N, Tian S, Huang W, Qin L. Systematic analysis of TREM2 and its carcinogenesis in pancreatic cancer. Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):3200-3216. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-201. Epub 2024 Jul 24. PMID: 39145088; PMCID: PMC11319948. 9: Zhou M, Liu L, Tan Y, Huang R, Yang Z. The mechanism of Taohong Siwu decoction in treating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a network pharmacology and molecular docking study. Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):3842-3853. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1019. Epub 2024 Jul 26. PMID: 39145055; PMCID: PMC11319946. 10: Byrne MM, Sutamtewagul G, Zeitler W, Mott SL, Zamba GKD, Kojadinovic A, Zhang J, Abu-Hejleh T, Clamon G, Furqan M. Phase II study of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine for relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 31;14:1303268. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1303268. PMID: 39144826; PMCID: PMC11322450. 11: Huang S, Yu H, Li Z, Tang Y, Luo L, Wu J, Li X, Shi Q, Xie S, Qiao G. Electronic patient-reported outcome-based surveillance system to evaluate safety and efficacy of preoperative immunochemotherapy with or without short-term chemoradiation in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ePRO- PICCRT): protocol for a prospective, single-arm, phase II study. J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4719-4726. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-274. Epub 2024 Jul 8. PMID: 39144362; PMCID: PMC11320245. 12: Yang H, Guo Y, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Jiao J, Mu T, Hou Z, Huang Q, Zhang G, Li X, Li J. Preoperative administration of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy for borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (BRES-1): study protocol of a single-arm, open-label, phase II study. J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4702-4710. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1851. Epub 2024 Jul 11. PMID: 39144354; PMCID: PMC11320267. 13: Li L, Wang H, Zhang S, Gao S, Lu X, Pan Y, Tang W, Huang R, Qiao K, Ning S. Statins inhibit paclitaxel-induced PD-L1 expression and increase CD8+ T cytotoxicity for better prognosis in breast cancer. Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):4716-4726. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001582. PMID: 39143707; PMCID: PMC11325938. 14: Cuesta J, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García Del Blanco B, Bosa F, Pérez de Prado A, Rumoroso JR, Romaguera R, Gutiérrez H, García Touchard A, López-Mínguez JR, Trillo R, de la Torre Hernández JM, Moreno R, Velázquez M, Moris C, Kockar MJ, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Bastante T, Val DD, Rivero F, Alfonso F. Long-Term Results of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug 12;17(15):1825-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.038. PMID: 39142758. 15: Chen S, Chen K, Lin Y, Wang S, Yu H, Chang C, Cheng T, Hsieh C, Li J, Lai H, Chen D, Huang C. Ganoderic acid T, a Ganoderma triterpenoid, modulates the tumor microenvironment and enhances the chemotherapy and immunotherapy efficacy through downregulating galectin-1 levels. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 13;491:117069. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2024.117069. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39142358. 16: Zhang J, Zhou P, Wu T, Zhang L, Kang J, Liao J, Jiang D, Hu Z, Han Z, Zhou B. Metformin combined with cisplatin reduces anticancer activity via ATM/CHK2-dependent upregulation of Rad51 pathway in ovarian cancer. Neoplasia. 2024 Aug 13;57:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2024.101037. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39142065. 17: Chen H, Moriceau S, Joseph A, Mailliet F, Li S, Tolle V, Duriez P, Dardennes R, Durand S, Carbonnier V, Stoll G, Sauvat A, Lachkar S, Aprahamian F, Alves Costa Silva C, Pan H, Montégut L, Anagnostopoulos G, Lambertucci F, Motiño O, Nogueira-Recalde U, Bourgin M, Mao M, Pan Y, Cerone A, Boedec E, Gouveia ZL, Marmorino F, Cremolini C, Derosa L, Zitvogel L, Kepp O, López-Otín C, Maiuri MC, Perez F, Gorwood P, Ramoz N, Oury F, Martins I, Kroemer G. Acyl-CoA binding protein for the experimental treatment of anorexia. Sci Transl Med. 2024 Aug 14;16(760):eadl0715. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adl0715. Epub 2024 Aug 14. PMID: 39141698. 18: Hao XY, Song WW, Li ML, Guo Y. Past and present: a bibliometric study on the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1442022. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1442022. PMID: 39139644; PMCID: PMC11319122. 19: Shao W, Lin Z, Xiahou Z, Zhao F, Xu J, Liu X, Cai P. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals that MYBL2 in malignant epithelial cells is involved in the development and progression of ovarian cancer. Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1438198. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1438198. PMID: 39136009; PMCID: PMC11317301. 20: Li X, Wu D, Tang J, Wu Y. The Efficiency and Safety of Triple-Drug Combination of Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel, Anlotinib and PD-1/L1 Inhibitors in the 2nd or Above Line of Advanced NSCLC: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Aug 8;16:1003-1012. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S472196. PMID: 39135711; PMCID: PMC11318595.